| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Auto-aligning OFF - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: but as i said ... it makes more sense to discuss in the older thread, that way we got all arguments in one place. much easier to forward issues to ccp that way. true
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.30 19:51:00
|
2. [Proposal] Align to Bookmarks - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Kate Machine on 30/03/2010 12:54:32 agree! + align at 0 m/s without leveling! (warp will still require the ship to gain speed)
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.30 12:53:00
|
3. [Innovation] MINEFIELDS - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Rudazara Alot of crap -Rudazara [email protected] I see clearly - Minefield before the gate, cloaked guy, frags keep warping in. Verdict: NO.
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.30 12:40:00
|
4. Minefields - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rudazara Alot of crap -Rudazara [email protected] I see clearly - Minefield before the gate, cloaked guy, frags keep warping in. Verdict: NO.
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.30 11:05:00
|
5. remove auto-levelling - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
AGREE! Re-Post from my thread: Quote: [ CCP needs to Turn-off auto-aligning when player stops ship's engines. At least add an option to do that. Cause sometimes it's needed to stay still and face certain direction. And turning 4m/s is not a...
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.30 10:42:00
|
6. Auto-aligning OFF - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Kate Machine on 30/03/2010 10:46:17 Originally by: Larinioides cornutus What he means is that ships shouldnt change their current direction when it's speed is 0. They keep dipping onto that horizontal position at full stop, ...
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.30 10:37:00
|
7. More space - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yeah, stretch population even more, making it even harder for soldiers of fortune to find a target? No thanx.
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.29 11:42:00
|
8. Auto-aligning OFF - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP needs to Turn-off auto-aligning when player stops ship's engines. At least add an option to do that. Cause sometimes it's needed to stay still and face certain direction. And turning 4m/s is not an option, cause the interface is not precise to...
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.29 11:37:00
|
9. holy fonts batman! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Kate Machine on 29/03/2010 10:18:05 Yeah, and UI is some cases takes too much space. And I want drone control attached to BUTTONS. Like turrets or missiles. And I want ships not to align horisontally after i turn-off their engines -...
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.29 10:18:00
|
10. If it wasn't for <x> I would have quit eve long ago! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If it wasn't for the 'solo pvp' I would have... well, actually I'm thinking of leaving Eve for the reason there's no such thing.
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.29 10:08:00
|
11. Nerfing fun: Dramiel - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Earthan uber powered nanoships were bad in past. They were great, you, bunghole!
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.29 10:03:00
|
12. The 'It's a game' excuse - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's a game - I don't take it seriously. Really.
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.26 20:30:00
|
13. Nerfing fun: Dramiel - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Kate Machine on 26/03/2010 16:48:35 Originally by: baltec1 Edited by: baltec1 on 26/03/2010 14:13:34 Originally by: Kate Machine Originally by: baltec1 Edited by: baltec1 on 25/03/2010 21:03:59 O...
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.26 16:46:00
|
14. Nerfing fun: Dramiel - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: baltec1 Edited by: baltec1 on 25/03/2010 21:03:59 Originally by: Rabid Clone Just a little more detailed about fit of that vengeance, pls :D duel rep tank is cool but the lol rockets take forever to kill an...
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.26 13:58:00
|
15. Only A Rocket Scientist Can Afford To Play Eve - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ak'athra J'ador to the op, you don't need to fly expensive ships. battlecruisers > hacs :) tellin' teh truth!
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.25 21:23:00
|
16. Dont tell Chribba, but its all one big joke... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
+1 Funny
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.25 21:11:00
|
17. Suicide ganking epidemic? Fight back. with carebear repping. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Admiral Pelleon You know what I do to people who RR me in high sec? I shoot them. Then concord kills them. Works that way?
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.25 21:00:00
|
18. Nerfing fun: Dramiel - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ranger 1 Quote: Post-Dramiel-boost: the Dramiel is the clear winner. There is NO diversity left. If you have the skills and ISK to fly a Dramiel, you fly a Dramiel because the Dramiel is the best ship in every possible...
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.25 20:19:00
|
19. Nerfing fun: Dramiel - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Verone Originally by: xXSolarisXx P.S tranais 14 mil in jita dramiel 70mil now what u think the taranis(or any other inty)should be equal to the dramiel? You obviously don't have the first clue about how th...
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.25 19:31:00
|
20. So what else is in Incarna? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why the heel anybody needs to walk in stations while gameplay of Eve is so bugged still? I mean, all they do is adding those small details, or expensive ships, which are costly to loose, which alows only superhuman manufacturers or ISK buyers fly ...
- by Kate Machine - at 2010.03.25 19:17:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |